MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405625985 · doi:10.1007/s10896-024-00775-z

Important Considerations for Research on Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury from the ENIGMA Consortium IPV Working Group

2024· article· en· W4405625985 on OpenAlexaff
Tricia L. Merkley, Hannah M. Lindsey, Emily L. Dennis, Brenda Eagan‐Johnson, Brenda Bartnik‐Olson, Michael J. Ellis, Julianna M. Nemeth, Maheen M. Adamson, Esther R. Bennett, Erin D. Bigler, Abby Bowman, Karen Caeyenberghs, Kathy S. Chiou, Nicola L. de Souza, Aeriel Halstead, Cooper B. Hodges, Andrei Irimia, Inga K. Koerte, Kathryn Laughon, Alexander Lin, Amy D. Marshall, Deleene S. Menefee, Kathleen Monahan, Mary R. Newsome, Jessica Salley Riccardi, Philine Rojczyk, Sally Rothemeyer, Dan J. Stein, Erin Sullivan‐Baca, Leah D. Talbert, David F. Tate, Paul van Donkelaar, S. Lipsky, Elisabeth A. Wilde, Carrie Esopenko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family Violence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaPan Am Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violenceMultidisciplinary approachPsychologyLegal psychologyPoison controlHuman factors and ergonomicsMedicineSocial psychologyMedical emergencySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.228
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.373
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2280.373
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.015
Open science0.0080.009
Research integrity0.0150.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family ViolenceSame topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207