Transient receptor potential vanilloid channel 2 contributes to multi-modal endoplasmic reticulum and perinuclear space dilations that can also be observed in prion-infected mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Our recent work on the prion protein and Na + ,K + -ATPases (NKAs) led us to revisit data from over 50 years ago, which suggested a similarity between vacuolation phenotypes in rodents poisoned with cardiac glycosides (CGs) and spongiform degeneration in prion disease. At that time, this hypothesis was dismissed because the vacuolation observed in prion diseases affects neurons, whereas CG poisoning in rodent brains led to swellings of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in astrocytes. We speculated that this difference might be specific to rodents and document here that the vacuolation shifts to neurons in mice expressing a humanized NKA α1 subunit. Next, we investigated the molecular mechanisms that could cause similar ER vacuolation in human cells in vitro . We found that certain stressors—such as overexpression of NKA α subunits and exposure to specific toxins known to trigger the unfolded protein response—can induce a phenotype characterized by profound ER dilation that is most strikingly observed for the perinuclear space (PNS). The ion imbalance typically caused by functional NKAs does not contribute to this phenotype. In fact, it can occur even with the overexpression of catalytically inactive NKAs. Several lines of evidence, generated with pharmacological agents, ion-specific dyes, antagonists, and truncated expression constructs, suggest a calcium leak channel in the ER, known as transient receptor potential vanilloid 2 (TRPV2), plays a role in this ER and PNS dilation. Additionally, we observed that the formation of these vacuoles coincides with a decrease in steady-state levels of the lipid kinase PIKFYVE, which is recognized for its role in endolysosomal fission and fusion processes. Finally, we found evidence of vacuoles in cryo-sectioned brains of prion-infected mice that can be filled with a fluorescent marker targeted to the ER and PNS. This raises the possibility that this vacuolation phenomenon contributes to spongiform degeneration seen in prion diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".