MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405632811 · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000002205

Refrigeration reduces instillation discomfort of a 0.09% cyclosporine A solution

2024· article· en· W4405632811 on OpenAlexaff
William Ngo, Nijani Nagaarudkumaran, Cassandra Bonnie Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCumulative doseEye dropSurgeryAnesthesiaOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SIGNIFICANCE: Topical cyclosporine A (CsA) for the treatment of dry eye disease is often associated with instillation discomfort, which may negatively influence patient adherence to therapy. This study found that refrigerating topical CsA reduced instillation discomfort compared with instillation of warm CsA. Thus, refrigerating CsA prior to instillation may improve patient experience when using CsA to manage dry eye disease. PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify instillation discomfort associated with cold or warm instillation of a 0.09% CsA. METHODS: Forty participants with symptomatic aqueous deficient dry eye were enrolled. A drop of cold (4°C) CsA was instilled in one eye, and a drop of warm (23°C) CsA was instilled in the other eye. The order and eye receiving the cold drop were randomized. Participants rated the discomfort of each eye (0, no discomfort; 10, maximal discomfort) prior to drop instillation, immediately post-instillation, and at each subsequent minute for 10 minutes. Area under the curve was used to quantify cumulative discomfort. RESULTS: Forty participants (39.6 ± 18.9 years old, 82% female) completed the study. A majority of participants (n = 24, 60%) experienced reduced cumulative discomfort with cold CsA, whereas the remainder experienced minimal difference (n = 10, 25%) or increased cumulative discomfort (n = 6, 15%). For those with reduced discomfort (n = 24), cumulative discomfort associated with cold instillation (median, 11.5 [2.2, 20.0]) was significantly lower (p<0.01) than cumulative discomfort associated with warm instillation (median, 17.5 [11.2, 32.2]). Cold instillation was associated with a median reduction of 1 discomfort point immediately post-instillation and at all subsequent time points (all p≤0.04, but not significant at t = 10), compared with warm instillation. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 60% of participants found that cold instillation of CsA solution induced less discomfort than warm instillation, lasting up to 9 minutes post-instillation. In contrast, although 15% of participants found reduced discomfort with warm instillation, the magnitude of discomfort associated with warm instillation was not significantly different than cold instillation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicOcular Surface and Contact LensFrench-language works237,207