MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405639398 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2024.2436095

Rational design of novel potential EGFR inhibitors: molecular docking, molecular descriptor and pharmacokinetics studies of piperidin-4-one derivatives

2024· article· en· W4405639398 on OpenAlexaff
M. Saritha, D. Rajaraman, S. Sonadevi, Tony Augustine, Jain Maria Thomas, L. Athishu Anthony

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsSt. Peter's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocking (animal)ChemistryPharmacokineticsRational designMolecular modelComputational chemistryCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryPharmacologyComputational biologyNanotechnologyMaterials scienceMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the most attractive drug targets against the human pancreas cancer cell line (Panc-1). In this research, Piperidin-4-one derivative is identified as novel potential EGFR inhibitors were subjected to molecular docking, molecular descriptor and pharmacokinetics studies in order to design new compound with high predicted activity. Using the 6-311G (d, p) basis set, the density functional theory (DFT) B3LYP method was utilised to calculate the optimal structure of the compound 1-(cyclopropanecarbonyl)−2,6-di(1H-indol-3-yl)−3-methylpiperidin-4-one (CIMP). The experimental bond length and bond angles were then compared with the data obtained from the reference compound. The electron densities of the donor (i) and acceptor (j) bonds and the hyper conjugative interaction energy E(2) were found using natural bonding orbital (NBO) analysis. The band gap energy value was found in calculations of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). Analysis has been done on molecular electrostatic potential. At the same theoretical level, the Mulliken atomic charges of the carbon, nitrogen and oxygen atoms were computed. The good nonlinear optical (NLO) property of the title molecule is demonstrated by the dipole moment, polarizability and first-order hyperpolarizability. The properties of partial density of states (PDOS), total density of states (TDOS) and thermodynamics were computed and discussed separately. Furthermore, statistical analyses were performed to elucidate the relationships between ADMET (Absorption, distribution, Metabolism, Elimination and Toxicity) properties of CIMP and molecular descriptors, including degree, neighborhood degree, degree entropy, and neighborhood degree entropy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PhysicsSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207