High Glucose Sensitizes Male and Female Rat Cardiomyocytes to Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been shown to regulate gene expressions in cardiomyocytes. However, it is not known if this effect is dependent on the sex of cells or the glucose level in the culture medium. In the present study, ventricular myocytes were prepared from male and female neonatal rats and maintained in either a glucose-rich (25 mM) medium or a low-glucose (3 mM), lipid-rich medium. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to measure changes in target genes (Axin2, Scn5a, and Tbx3) after treatment with 1, 3, or 10 µM of CHIR-99021, an activator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. CHIR induced similar changes in Axin2, Tbx3, and Scn5a transcripts in male and female NRVMs in both media, suggesting the absence of sex difference. However, cells in a high-glucose medium showed greater increases in Axin2 and Tbx3 transcripts than cells in a low-glucose medium. In addition, a low concentration of CHIR (1 µM) reduced the Scn5a transcript in cells in a high-glucose medium but not in a low-glucose medium, suggesting an increased sensitivity to Wnt signaling by high glucose. A non-linear relationship was identified between Axin2 transcript upregulation and Scn5a transcript downregulation in CIHR-treated NRVMs. These data suggest that high glucose sensitizes both male and female cardiomyocytes to Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".