MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405653305 · doi:10.1163/15707563-bja10158

Population genomics reveals the genetic diversity and evolution of the sexual dimorphism of Temminck’s tragopan (Tragopan temminckii)

2024· article· en· W4405653305 on OpenAlexaff
Pengzhen Huang, Yuhong Guo, Bo Dai, Dong Liang, Peng Feng, Tingtao Xu, Longying Wen, Xin Lü, Fangqing Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnimal Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEvolutionary biologyPopulationSexual dimorphismGenetic diversityZoologyEcologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent advances in whole-genome sequencing technologies have shown potential for establishing a genomic-level evolutionary process framework for avian species. In this study, a comprehensive whole-genome resequencing approach was employed to generate genome-wide data from 12 individuals of Temminck’s tragopan ( Tragopan temminckii ), a species under imminent threat and experiencing rapid decline due to habitat fragmentation and loss in China. Population genomic analyses indicated significant genetic diversity and increased linkage disequilibrium in Temminck’s tragopan, despite habitat fragmentation. It was further suggested that the historical population dynamics of Temminck’s tragopan from the western Sichuan Plateau was influenced by glacial climatic events and anthropogenic activities. Furthermore, male-specific developmental pathways, particularly those related to the androgen receptor and associated genes, were found to contribute to the observed sexual dimorphism in Temminck’s tragopan. These findings establish a preliminary basis for comprehending the evolutionary dynamics of Temminck’s tragopan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnimal BiologySame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207