MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405661739 · doi:10.3171/2024.7.jns232341

Natural history of dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms: a multinational study

2024· article· en· W4405661739 on OpenAlexaff
Behnam Rezai Jahromi, Reza Dashti, Nakao Ota, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh Ohadi, Visish M. Srinivasan, David Fiorella, Hanna Kaukovalta, Aki Laakso, Christoph Schwartz, Riku Kivisaari, Vladimir Zamotin, Antti Lindgren, Timo Koivisto, João Silva, Oriela Rustemi, Milla Kelahaara, Babak S. Jahromi, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Matthew B. Potts, Constantin Hecker, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Jussi Numminen, F. Göhre, Hugo Andrade-Barazante, Ferzat Hijazy, Lars Wessels, Mohamad Reza Kalani, Peter Vajkoczy, Robert F. Spetzler, Juha E. Jääskeläinen, Akitsugu Kawashima, Ethan A. Winkler, Olli Tähtinen, Roberto Latini, Jennifer Meessen, Rokuya Tanikawa, Michael T. Lawton, Mika Niemelä

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNatural historyStroke (engine)Modified Rankin ScaleRadiological weaponPopulationAneurysmSurgeryProportional hazards modelVertebrobasilar insufficiencyVertebral arteryPediatricsInternal medicineIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms (DVBAs) are expansions of arterial tissue leading to aneurysmal formations without an obvious neck. Their natural history is poorly understood; usually patients are admitted with thromboembolic complications and/or neurological symptoms from the mass effect. There have not been international collective data, and correct timing for highly risky treatments has been under discussion. The goal of this study was to define the natural history of DVBA by long-term follow-up in an international population of patients with DVBA. METHODS: The authors collected data in 382 patients with DVBAs from 11 centers in Europe, the US, and Japan. The patients were followed until new ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, symptomatic compression of the brainstem or cranial nerves, decline in modified Rankin Scale score, or death. Treatment excluded patients from further analysis. Demographic and radiological characteristics of patients were collected and a new classification was created based on the radiological characteristics of the DVBA. In total 223 patients were treated conservatively in the first phase of treatment. The data required for natural history calculations were available for 221 patients, with a cumulative follow-up of 622.3 patient-years. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess risk factors with an influence on patient outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 21.5% of patients were admitted due to the mass effect, and there were 67 (30%) patient deaths during follow-up, 45 (20.2%) of which were related to aneurysms. The annual mortality and morbidity were 10.8% and 1.6%, respectively. Most of the patients with DVBAs were male, although sex did not affect prognosis when compared to the radiological characteristics of the lesion. The natural history of DVBAs was also impacted by a new classification, in which an age 50 years and older predicted mortality. Furthermore, a DVBA's maximum diameter was directly proportional to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study verifies the malignancy of DVBAs and encourages invasive treatment in the early phase of disease progression based on radiological characteristics and patient age when a treatment option is considered suitable. This also stresses the need for continued investigations to develop new therapeutics with acceptable safety profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207