Protective effect of seabuckthorn seed protein on renal function in diabetic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• SSP had stable hypoglycemic activity and enhanced the glucose tolerance of the mice. • SSP could reduce serum creatinine, uric acid, AGEs and MDA in renal tissue. • SSP avoid renal lesion via hypoglycemic effect and mitigation of oxidative damage. Diabetes often causes serious kidney damage, it has been reported that seabuckthorn seed protein (SSP) has significant hypoglycemic activity, but the specific effect on renal function has not been reported. This study aims at deeply exploring the renoprotective benefits of SSP. SSP (protein content 80.23 ± 2.0%) was used to treat the db/db mice (50–250 mg/kg/d). Such SSP treatment could significantly reduce the typical symptoms of renal dysfunction including body weight, kidney index, tissue, blood and urinary parameters. SSP had stable hypoglycemic activity and enhanced the glucose tolerance of db/db mice, in addition, SSP was more effective than metformin in reducing proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum uric acid, serum AGEs (Advanced Glycation End Products) and MDA (Malondialdehyde) in renal tissue. SSP exerted actions against renal lesion likely via hypoglycemic effect, and mitigation of oxidative damage. Thus, it is technically feasible and economically viable to generate SSP as a potential renoprotective protein resource for the prevention of diabetic nephropathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".