Peritonitis After Endometrial Cytology in a Woman With Hydrosalpinx Caused by Chronic <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(CT) are asymptomatic, while others experience lower abdominal discomfort when the inflammatory process extends to the fallopian tubes. Without treatment, salpingitis can progress to pelvic peritonitis and subsequently, peritonitis in the upper abdomen, a condition known as Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome, in some cases. A nucleic acid amplification assay is required for diagnosing CT infection. However, this assay may yield a negative result even in the presence of CT infection. This report presents a case of a 45-year-old woman with a history of hydrosalpinx and no history of lower abdominal pain who underwent endometrial cytology at a local gynecology clinic because of irregular bleeding. The following day, she developed peritonitis. A nucleic acid amplification assay for CT yielded a negative result at the onset of peritonitis. Hence, the patient received tazobactam/piperacillin as a treatment option. However, this drug was ineffective. Subsequently, the patient was found to be positive for serum CT IgG and IgA antibodies. Her peritonitis could have developed as a result of endometrial cytology performed in the presence of a chronic CT infection in the uterus; through this procedure, CT-infected endometrial cells may have spread into the abdominal cavity via the fallopian tubes. Nevertheless, the addition of minocycline hydrochloride markedly improved the symptoms of peritonitis. This case shows that when dealing with chronic CT infections in the female internal genitalia, the standard nucleic acid amplification testing screening test for CT might not be entirely effective in detecting the infection. Additionally, it is important to recognize that in cases of chronic CT infection of the uterus that involved genital bleeding, examining the uterine cavity could lead to peritonitis in a short timeframe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".