MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405667317 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109234

Implications of water management on methane emissions and grain yield in paddy rice: A case study under subtropical conditions in Brazil using the CSM-CERES-Rice model

2024· article· en· W4405667317 on OpenAlexaff
Evandro Henrique Figueiredo Moura da Silva, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Kenneth J. Boote, Santiago Vianna Cuadra, Cheryl Porter, W. B. Scivittaro, S. Steinmetz, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Water Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsSubtropicsEnvironmental scienceMethaneYield (engineering)Grain yieldHumid subtropical climateMethane emissionsAgronomyHydrology (agriculture)EcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food and plays a crucial role in the food security of many countries. However, rice cultivation is associated with significant methane (CH4) emissions, contributing to overall greenhouse gas emissions and, thus, climate change. In this context, process-based crop models are useful tools for understanding and predicting the complex interactions between crop production, environmental factors, and sustainability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Cropping System Model (CSM)-CERES-Rice model and DSSAT-GHG module to predict daily methane emissions and rice grain yield for different irrigation practices in a subtropical environment. The study employed a comprehensive approach, including measurements of daily CH4 emissions, phenological stages, final aboveground biomass, and grain yield for rice cultivars BRS Pampa, BRS Pampeira, A705, and XP113 conducted over four consecutive crop seasons (2019–2023) and two irrigation systems: continuous flooding (CF) or alternate wetting and drying (AWD) in Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil. We followed a four-step methodology involving initial calibration of cultivar parameters, sensitivity analysis (soil-related parameters associated with CH4 emissions), final cultivar parameters calibration, and long-term simulation analysis. Based on the sensitivity analysis and comparison to observed emissions, modifications were made to soil-related parameters such as soil buffer regeneration after drainage events (BRAD) and the fraction of soil water-filled porosity above which methane production occurs (WFPSthresh) to enhance the accuracy of methane production. Optimal parameter combinations (WFPSthresh = 70 %, BRAD = 0.070 d−1) were selected based on a comparative analysis, enabling CH4 simulations under non-flooded conditions. The predictive capability of the CERES-Rice model exhibited an average bias for grain yield of 485 kg ha−1 under CF and 592 kg ha−1 under AWD conditions. The results showed that the GHG module of DSSAT, after BRAD and WFPSthresh parameter adjustments, was able to simulate daily CH4 emissions in paddy rice with a very good agreement (average index of agreement (D-Statistic) of 0.87 for CF and 0.70 for AWD). Following the model evaluation, long-term simulations for different irrigation practices revealed the impact on grain yield, cumulative methane emissions, and seasonal applied irrigation. The highest crop water-methane productivity (CWMP = 52 %) was observed under sprinkler irrigation at 50 % soil water depletion, identifying it as the most sustainable option in this subtropical environment. Thus, the CSM-CERES-Rice model combined with the DSSAT-GHG module proved to be a potential tool for agricultural and environmental management of rice fields under subtropical conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Water ManagementSame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207