Construct validity and responsiveness of ASAS Health Index assessed in two longitudinal studies of tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor initiation and dose reduction in patients with axial spondyloarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) is a novel questionnaire of global functioning for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the construct validity, discriminatory ability and responsiveness of ASAS HI in relation to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), MRI and radiography. METHODS: Data from two longitudinal studies with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) initiation (novel MRI And biomarkers in Golimumab-treated patients with axial spondyloarthritis (MANGO): n=45) respectively tapering (Dose adjustment of Biological treatment in patients with SpA (DOBIS): n=106) were used. Analyses included a wide panel of PROMs, MRI and radiography scores of the spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJs). RESULTS: In the MANGO study, 30 (68%) patients were clinical responders at week 16. In the DOBIS study, 105 (99%) patients flared after mean (SD; min-max) 31 (17; 2.7-81) weeks. After initiation of TNF inhibitor in MANGO, ASAS HI significantly decreased from baseline to week 4, 16 and 52. In DOBIS, ASAS significantly increased from baseline to the flare visit and significantly decreased from the flare visit to week 96. In multivariate regression models, ASAS HI was independently associated with Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI SIJ Inflammation score, Canada-Denmark MRI Spine Inflammation score, EuroQol, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Patient Global. Patients stratified according to ASAS HI health status groups (good, moderate, poor) at baseline and change categories (absolute and percentage change) from baseline to week 16/flare showed good discriminatory ability for almost all outcome variables (p≤0.001). ASAS HI had a large responsiveness in MANGO (standardised response mean (SRM)=-1.3, effect size (ES)=-1.7) and moderate responsiveness in DOBIS (SRM=0.7, ES=0.6). CONCLUSION: ASAS HI showed good construct validity, discriminatory ability and responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02011386.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".