New tools for a legacy problem: How isotope tracers inform area of concern actions in the St. Louis River in Lake Superior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous mercury (Hg) sources can contribute to biological burdens within the Great Lakes, including atmospheric deposition (e.g., precipitation), non-point source land runoff (e.g., watershed), and legacy contamination. Due to these different environmental entry points, it is often difficult to ascertain if legacy Hg contamination contributes to contemporary fish consumption advisories within Areas of Concern (AOCs), as designated by the United States-Canada Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. In this study, we aimed to assess the contributions of legacy Hg to sediments in nearshore wetland habitats and co-located prey items (dragonfly larvae and yellow perch) within the St. Louis River AOC using Hg stable isotopes. We observed that nearshore sediments had the same Hg source portfolio as previously examined main channel sites. Furthermore, this data confirmed that two major Hg sources were contributing to sediments within nearshore regions of the St. Louis River AOC: legacy and watershed Hg. The contribution of legacy Hg was estimated in biota and demonstrated that up to 64% of the Hg in fish tissue in the lower estuary (St. Louis Bay) was from legacy sources, but that this percentage declined substantially when examining upstream regions of the AOC. These data indicate the influence of legacy Hg to the food web varies spatially within the St. Louis River. We further found that watershed Hg sources are an important Hg contributor to the St. Louis River, which likely applies to other impacted and unimpacted tributaries across the Great Lakes region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".