Clinical Applications of Bone Marrow <scp>CD34</scp> Immunohistochemistry (<scp>BM CD34 IHC</scp>) Assay: International Council for Standardization in Hematology (<scp>ICSH</scp>) Guidelines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Investigation of bone marrow (BM) trephine biopsies and/or clot sections by CD34 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing has been used by pathologists for several decades, and its clinical value has been well established with QBEND10 being the most frequently used primary antibody (Ab) clone. However, most other parameters related to the IHC protocol as well as the readout vary widely between clinical laboratories and in the published literature. The ICSH Working Group having reviewed the published evidence has established guidelines that will help to harmonize performance and reporting of CD34 IHC on BM biopsies. METHODS: The methodology is based on the published "guidelines for guidelines" (GRADE, AGREE) with modifications to the specific laboratory medicine environment and to specific key questions. Review of the published literature resulted in 49 articles relevant to clinical applications of the BM CD34 IHC. Five key questions were addressed including testing indications, technical performance, readout methodology, terminology, and reporting. RESULTS: A total of 23 guidelines were grouped according to the key questions. CONCLUSION: BM CD34 IHC testing is complex with both the protocol and the pathologist's readout requiring validation to ensure reported results are reproducible and accurate. The readout/interpretation must be adapted to a specific purpose of the assay (clinicopathological question) and the type and overall sample quality. Standardized terminology and reporting are essential if CD34 IHC assay is being used for clinical diagnostics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.058 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".