Indigenous women-led climate crisis solutions: A decolonial perspective from the Garo Indigenous community in Bangladesh
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the critical impact of climate change on land-based culture and matriarchy within the Garo Indigenous Community in Bangladesh. Using a decolonial perspective, we explored how Garo Indigenous women are deeply rooted in land-based traditions and social structures and face unprecedented challenges. Through a decolonial lens, we explore intersections between climate change, land-based practices, and the matriarchal land-based practice. It shows the Garo Indigenous community's land-based adaptive strategies and resilience in climate change. This paper emphasizes the importance of centering Indigenous perspectives in climate discourse, advocating for decolonization as a crucial framework for understanding and addressing the multifaceted impacts of climate change on land-based cultures and matriarchy. By providing decolonial analysis from the Garo Indigenous land-based perspective, this research contributes to a broader understanding of the effects of climate change on Indigenous communities, creating a decolonized and traditional land-based approaches to climate adaptation and mitigation policies. The paper calls for action to recognize Indigenous land-right, traditional matriarchy family leadership to safeguard the unique cultural heritage and gender dynamics of the Garo Indigenous community while addressing the broader implications for global climate justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it