MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405697019 · doi:10.14709/barbj.17.1.2024.04

Continuing increase in the abundance of the Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus) in Maritime Canada in the presence of White-nose Syndrome

2024· article· en· W4405697019 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Donald F. McAlpine, Karen J. Vanderwolf, Christine Fehlner‐Gardiner, Scott McBurney, Darrian Washinger

Bibliographic record

VenueBarbastella · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Wildlife Health Cooperative
KeywordsEptesicus fuscusWhite (mutation)Abundance (ecology)GeographyNoseBiologyZoologyEcologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on public reporting (mainly incidents of bats in homes and bats submitted for rabies testing and health monitoring), the number of reports of the Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus) in New Brunswick (Canada) has increased significantly over the past three decades. Prior to 1990 this species was rarely encountered in the province. From 2000 to 2013 the number of Big Brown Bat reports remained low but regular, including during the emergence of the white-nose syndrome (WNS) epidemic and subsequent endemicity of the disease in New Brunswick. From 2014-2020 numbers of Big Brown Bats reported have risen markedly. The Big Brown Bat is now the bat species most frequently encountered by the public in New Brunswick, although the species remains rare in Nova Scotia and is as yet unrecorded on Prince Edward Island. Establishment and initial increase of the Big Brown Bat in New Brunswick pre-dates the introduction of WNS to North America. Recent increases may be a continuation of a trend related to climate warming that was underway prior to WNSinduced declines in bat species in eastern Canada. However, we cannot discount a role for disease-mediated competitive release in the current surge in reports of the Big Brown Bat in New Brunswick. We also document aspects of the natural history of the Big Brown Bat in the Maritimes, including maternity roosts, autumn swarming behaviour, and first reported over-wintering by multiple Big Brown Bats in underground hibernacula in the region. While the probability of being bitten by a rabid bat in Canada is exceedingly low, the increasing abundance of the Big Brown Bat in New Brunswick and its association with human dwellings throughout the year may warrant increased public education and surveillance for rabies. However, given the continuing persecution of bats, any such educational campaign must be coupled with a strong message emphasizing the importance of bat conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBarbastella→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→