MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405708362 · doi:10.2196/56592

The Use of “Cancer Ratio” in Differentiating Malignant and Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study

2024· article· en· W4405708362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sai Pooja Chalamalasetty, Preetam Rajgopal Acharya, Thomas Antony, R Anand, Himani Kotian

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePleural effusionTuberculosisThoracoscopyMalignant pleural effusionMalignancyInternal medicineCancerProspective cohort studyLung cancerGastroenterologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between tuberculosis and malignancy as the cause of an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion is difficult due to similarities in the cellular and biochemical characteristics of the pleural fluid in both conditions. Microbiological tests in tubercular pleural effusions have a poor diagnostic yield, and the long turnaround time for results prevents an early diagnosis. The diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is hampered by a variable yield of pleural fluid cytology and closed pleural biopsy and the fact that thoracoscopy may not be readily available or feasible in each patient. A key gap in the existing knowledge is the performance of the serum lactate dehydrogenase to pleural adenosine deaminase ratio (ie, "cancer ratio"; CR) in differentiating between tuberculous and MPE in a high tuberculosis prevalence country like India, although its use has been well established in Western literature. The CR may find a practical application in the community health care settings in low-income countries without ready access to biopsy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the CR as a test to differentiate tubercular and malignant etiology in patients with an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion. Secondary objectives to be assessed include a comparison of CR to pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in MPE and the association of histologic type of lung carcinoma to the CR positivity. METHODS: This hospital-based, prospective, observational study will include patients admitted with pleural effusion whose pleural fluid reports indicate a lymphocyte-predominant exudate. The ability of the CR to discriminate between tuberculous and MPE will be evaluated as a primary objective of this study. The performance of CR and pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of MPE will be compared using the receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve for both tests as a secondary objective. The association between a positive CR and histologic type of lung cancer will be analyzed as well. RESULTS: Data collection began in June 2022. As of March 24, 2024, we have recruited 22 patients. Outcomes of the study are expected at the end of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will provide an objective basis for the use of CR in differentiating between tuberculosis and malignancy as the cause of an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56592.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.578
GPT teacher head0.595
Teacher spread0.016 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesFrench-language works237,207