¿Rompiendo con el subdesarrollo? Transformaciones de la estructura productiva, empleo y población en La Rioja, 1976-2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The socioeconomic impacts of neoliberal economic policies, both globally and in individual countries, such as Argentina, have been widely discussed in the academic literature (cf. Basualdo, 2006; Cantamutto y Wainer, 2013; Gago, 2014; Harvey, 2007; Laval y Dardot, 2013; Piva, 2012; Svampa, 2005). However, its impacts in the province of La Rioja, Argentina, have not been analysed in great detail in the literature (for exceptions, see Hadad y Palmisano, 2017; Olmedo, 2006). To address these limitations, the present work proposes to analyse the socioeconomic impacts of neoliberal structural reforms in the province of La Rioja between 1976 and 2001, emphasising changes in the productive structure, employment and poverty, from a heterodox perspective. Based on an analysis of primary and secondary sources -statistical data from CFI-ECLAC and INDEC, texts on the economic, political and social history of Argentina during the period under investigation, with a particular emphasis on the changes experienced in La Rioja-, the article shows the similarities and differences in the socioeconomic impacts of neoliberal structural reforms in La Rioja compared to the rest of the Argentina. In this way, the work seeks to offer new knowledge about the specificities of socioeconomic development in the province of La Rioja in the period investigated, as well as contribute to the broader literature on the economic history of neoliberalism worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".