MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405715671 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae0d3f

Ti and Spi, Carrollian extended boundaries at timelike and spatial infinity

2025· preprint· en· W4405715671 on OpenAlexafffund
Jack Borthwick, Maël Chantreau, Yannick Herfray

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceMathematicsInfinityInvariant (physics)Pure mathematicsSpacetimeType (biology)Boundary (topology)Symmetry (geometry)Group (periodic table)Symmetry groupAutomorphismMathematical analysisMathematical physicsGeometryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The goal of this paper is to provide a definition for a notion of extended boundary at time and space-like infinity which, following Figueroa-O’Farril–Have–Prohazka–Salzer, we refer to as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>Ti</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>Spi</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . This definition applies to asymptotically flat spacetime in the sense of Ashtekar–Romano and we wish to demonstrate, by example, its pertinence in a number of situations. The definition is invariant, is constructed solely from the asymptotic data of the metric and is such that automorphisms of the extended boundaries are canonically identified with asymptotic symmetries. Furthermore, scattering data for massive fields are realised as functions on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>Ti</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and a geometric identification of cuts of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>Ti</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> with points of Minkowski then produces an integral formula of Kirchhoff type. Finally, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>Ti</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>Spi</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> are both naturally equipped with (strong) Carrollian geometries which, under mild assumptions, enable to reduce the symmetry group down to the BMS group, or to Poincaré in the flat case. In particular, Strominger’s matching conditions are naturally realised by restricting to Carrollian geometries compatible with a discrete symmetry of Spi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207