MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405721278 · doi:10.26685/urncst.686

Aducanumab

2024· article· en· W4405721278 on OpenAlexaff
Keysa K. Mundel, Corin R. Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-related skin toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Definition: Aducanumab is “a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets aggregated Aβ [amyloid-beta protein]”. This has been used as a novel therapy for treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as AD is characterized by an accumulation of amyloid plaques in the brain, which are proposed to lead to the cognitive decline attributed to this disease. Millions of people are impacted by this disease worldwide, highlighting its importance for research. Aducanumab was the first drug designed to bind to Aβ plaques in the brain and was approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in 2021 for treatment of AD. Body: By binding to Aβ, aducanumab triggers microglia to phagocytose the fibrils and plaques created by the aggregation of Aβ, reducing the neuroinflammatory effects often seen in AD. Aducanumab has the highest affinity for amyloid oligomers and fibrils, which are the most detrimental structures when accumulated. Not only does aducanumab function by removing Aβ plaques, but it may also reduce neuroinflammatory cytokine production and decrease the rate of astrogliosis, both of which fluctuate depending on levels of Aβ. Patients in early or middle stages of AD, and who have been screened for Aβ levels via amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scans, can be prescribed aducanumab by their healthcare providers. Aducanumab is administered once every month intravenously, at a dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight. Despite its ability to target and breakdown Aβ oligopeptide aggregates, significant positive effects on cognitive decline have not yet been proven. High doses of aducanumab were found to have moderate effects only in patients with early onset AD and did not show improvements for prior memory loss. Further, aducanumab treatment has been linked with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), a group of neurological harmful effects comprised of two main subdivisions of edema and microhemorrhages. Other pharmacological drugs are being formulated to target Aβ in a more specific manner than aducanumab, such as lecanemab. Additionally, research is further investigating the effects of holistic treatment interventions, like maintaining good physical health, on the progression of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicChemotherapy-related skin toxicityFrench-language works237,207