MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Outbreak of jellyfish stings on the Chabahar Coasts of Iran and investigation of its environmental causes

2024· article· en· W4405731928 on OpenAlexaff
Rouhullah Dehghani, Masoomeh Varzandeh, Marzieh Akbari, Seyedmahdi Takht Firoozeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Entomological Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsCentennial College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakJellyfishMedicineVeterinary medicineFisheryEnvironmental healthBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis study examines the potential environmental causes of jellyfish occurrence. This is a retrospective descriptive-analytical study that, given the recent outbreaks of jellyfish stings in Iran and similar events worldwide, as per available reports, examines the potential environmental causes in the Persian Gulf and the Oman Sea and analyzes the environmental factors. According to the report during the new year 2023, more than 550 cases of jellyfish stings were reported on the Chabahar coast within about two weeks. Hundreds of jellyfish carcasses have been observed on the coasts. According to reports, jellyfish have been approaching the Makran coasts every year, so that swimmers are affected by stings. Various human factors such as salinization of water due to desalination plants, increased oil pollution due to the discharge of tanker water, habitat alteration due to the construction of marine facilities, the entry of factory effluents and raw sewage or wastewater, increased turbidity, dissolved oxygen levels, and human factors such as water pollution, Trawling fishing of aquatic organisms, and the reduction of jellyfish predators are among the possible reasons for the increase in the jellyfish population and human encounters with swimmers and their stinging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Entomological ResearchSame topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207