MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405734438 · doi:10.1002/smll.202409701

Durable Hydrophobic Iridescent Films with Tunable Colors from Self‐Assembled Cellulose Nanocrystals

2024· article· en· W4405734438 on OpenAlexafffund
Zongzhe Li, Yinghao Zhang, Carl A. Michal, Mark J. MacLachlan

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundFPInnovationsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsIridescenceMaterials scienceStructural colorationCelluloseSelf-assemblyLiquid crystalLyotropicChemical engineeringPhotonicsNanocrystalPhotonic crystalNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsOpticsLiquid crystalline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are known to self-assemble into a left-handed chiral nematic lyotropic liquid crystalline phase in water. When captured in the solid state, this structure can impart films with photonic properties that make them promising candidates in photonics, sensing, security, and other areas. Unfortunately, the intrinsic hydrophilicity of CNCs renders these iridescent films susceptible to moisture, thereby limiting their practicality. To address this issue, a novel strategy to prepare hydrophobic iridescent films from pre-assembled CNC films is reported here. These films underwent a swelling process, followed by esterification using acid anhydrides to render them hydrophobic. By increasing the alkyl chain length of the anhydride reagent, the hydrophobicity of the resulting iridescent films can be enhanced. They showed water contact angles ranging from 34° to 115° and demonstrated tunable structural color spanning from blue to red. Moreover, they also exhibited good durability when exposed to water for 24 h. This innovative method for producing durable hydrophobic iridescent thin films is expected to facilitate their use in water-proof photonic coatings, optical sensors, and other applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207