MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405737955 · doi:10.3390/su17010020

Investigating Surface Settlements During Shield Tunneling Using Numerical Analysis

2024· article· en· W4405737955 on OpenAlexaff
Ruixia He, Ziwen Zhou, Shuai Li, Sai K. Vanapalli

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsShieldHuman settlementSurface (topology)Quantum tunnellingEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringGeographyMaterials scienceArchaeologyMathematicsOptoelectronicsGeometryPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the subway system in Shenyang City, China, plays a vital role in alleviating traffic congestion and promoting sustainable societal growth. However, the deformation of the surface caused by the tunneling of the shield presents a significant threat to the structural integrity of Shenyang Subway Line 2 and adjacent geotechnical structures. To tackle this challenge, a set of FEA (finite element analysis) simulations were carried out to examine surface deformation under various construction scenarios for Line 2. These simulations were compared with empirical formulas and numerical analyses conducted using Midas GTS NX 2019 software, in addition to actual site measurements. The outcomes of the finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrated a closer alignment with the empirical data than with traditional formulas. The maximum deformation was observed to be approximately twice as large as the equivalent diameter at the back of the excavation face. The analysis indicated that surface deformation is inversely correlated with overburden thickness (H), soil elasticity (E), and the grout filling rate of the shield tail (ψ), while it is directly proportional to the shield’s outer diameter (D). This study provides important methods used in the shield tunneling process employed in the Shenyang subway and suggests that the developed methodologies may be applicable to similar subway projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainabilitySame topicTunneling and Rock MechanicsFrench-language works237,207