An experimental investigation of microgravity conditions on FDM-based in-space polymer additive manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In-orbit additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to overcome limitations imposed by current launch vehicles, such as restrictions on payload size and weight. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), one of the predominant AM techniques used in space, operates in a microgravity environment where interactions between temperature, load, and motion are complex and not well-known. In FDM, surface tension and gravity significantly influence layer deposition, affecting mechanical properties and interlayer bonding. Previous research indicates that gravity may strongly impact layer height and bonding strength during FDM-based AM. This study explores the influence of gravity on interlayer fusion and global mechanical properties by printing specimens at various angles (0°–90°) relative to the gravitational direction. The 0° angle simulates a microgravity environment, while the 90° angle represents Earth-like conditions. Tensile and compressive test specimens were fabricated and evaluated through stress-strain analysis. Tensile tests revealed a decrease in ultimate tensile strength, fracture stress, and strain with increasing print angle from 0° to 75°, followed by a recovery at 90°, likely due to a shift in failure mode at the micro level. Compression tests showed substantial improvements in ultimate compressive strength and modulus between 0° and 15°, with ductility remaining stable across all angles. Dimensional analysis indicated reduced specimen dimensions at higher print angles. The findings suggest that while zero-gravity conditions weaken interlayer bonding, the overall mechanical performance of materials in microgravity is less compromised than under Earth-like conditions. These insights are valuable for optimizing polymer-based AM processes for in-space manufacturing applications. • Investigated gravity effect on raster interlayer bond and mechanical properties. • Simulated microgravity by printing samples at angles (0° ∼ 90°) relative to gravity. • Tensile tests show a decline in strength and fracture strain as print angle increase. • Compressive tests show notable improved properties from 0° to 15° print angle. • Higher print angles result in reduced tensile specimen dimensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".