Quantitative and Qualitative Potential of Peanuts Produced in Northwestern Paraná, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quantification and qualification of the productive potential of peanuts allow for the differentiation of cultivars and identification of the most productive ones at regional levels. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity and grain quality of peanut cultivars and genotypes cultivated in the northwest region of Paraná. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design consisting of four cultivars and four genotypes, with four replications, in plots of 3.6x3.0 m composed of four rows spaced at 0.9 m. Plants were evaluated pre-harvest, at harvest, and post-harvest to characterize their productive potential. Data were subjected to analysis of variance using the F-test, and means were compared using the Scott-Knott test (p≥0.05). There were significant differences among treatments for the variables analyzed. Productivity ranged from 3225.45 kg ha-1 to 5129.31 kg ha-1. Genotypes 2173 OL and 2091 OL, and cultivars BRS 425 OL and BRS 427 OL showed the best productive performance. Cultivar BRS 421 OL and genotype 2173 OL exhibited lower severity of early leaf spot. Under the edaphoclimatic conditions of management and cultivation, the genetic origin influenced the productive potential of the tested lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".