MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405757145 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104729

Maximizing the performance of heat stressed broilers by optimizing starch-to-lipid ratios, digestible amino acid, and metabolizable energy during the finisher phase

2024· article· en· W4405757145 on OpenAlexafffund
Dilshaan Duhra, A. D. Beaulieu, T. Shynkaruk, Juliano César de Paula Dorigam, Rose Whelan, K. Schwean-Lardner

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersEvonik OperationsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChicken Farmers of Saskatchewan
KeywordsFood scienceStarchChemistryBroilerPhase (matter)Animal scienceBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. Sex-specific starter and grower diets were fed until d 21. The rooms were maintained at 21°C during d 21 to 27. From d 27 to 32, the birds were subjected to cyclical heat stress, with 12 h of 31°C followed by 12 h of 21°C, with a minimum RH of 50 %. BW and feed residual weights were measured on d 21, 27, and 32, then used to calculate BW gain (BWG) and feed-to-gain ratios (F:G). On d 33, 20 birds per treatment per sex were slaughtered to determine carcass characteristics. Under these conditions (d 21 to 32), maximum male BWG of 926 g was estimated to occur when fed a diet comprised of 42.2 % Basal B and 57.8 % Basal C with a S:L ratio of 4:1, AME of 3089 kcal/kg, and 1.01 % DigLys. Diet did not influence female BWG during heat stress. Although a practical recommendation was not possible for optimal breast meat yield (% live weight) and F:G ratios, the results, indicated that increasing DigLys would improve these parameters under heat stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207