MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405759972 · doi:10.1177/10935266241308946

Clinical and Pathological Features of a Schwannoma Harboring a <i>SH3PXD2A::HTRA1</i> Gene Fusion in a Pre-pubescent Patient

2024· article· en· W4405759972 on OpenAlexaff
Aída Glembocki, Robert Siddaway, Anthony Arnoldo, Molly Jakeman, Anthea Lafrenière

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchwannomaLesionNodule (geology)AnatomyMedicinePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 11-year-old girl presented with a soft tissue lesion on the dorsal aspect of the left middle finger. Ultrasound imaging demonstrated a 2.8 cm × 0.8 cm × 0.8 cm lesion overlying the dorsal aspect of the base of the digit near the metacarpophalangeal joint. The patient’s past medical history is remarkable for neuroblastoma, diagnosed at 9 months of age, with no MYCN amplification or 1p loss. We report a pediatric schwannoma harbouring a SH3PXD2A::HTRA1 gene fusion with a distinctive serpentine histology. The lesion consisted of well-circumscribed nodules surrounded by thin EMA-positive perineural capsules. Each nodule was composed of lesional cells arranged in short fascicles with occasional clefting and a distinct “serpentine” palisading pattern. The lesion demonstrated Antoni A regions with Verocay body formation. No significant Antoni B areas were seen. The lesional Schwannian cells were bland with elongated and tapered nuclei, showing strong and diffuse positivity for S100. This pre-pubescent girl (Tanner Stage 2) is currently the youngest reported case of fusion-positive schwannoma. In addition, she has a significant prior history of a malignant neoplasm, and the lesion arose in an appendicular location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesFrench-language works237,207