Space-time matrix. Gravity and expansion of the Universe. <i>Perpetum Creatio</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This hypothesis challenges the classic concept of space and time. Space is not a perennial and immovable physical concept but an evanescent occurrence of dark energy. Therefore, space should be continuously generated to maintain the physical reality of the universe. This continuous space-generating phenomenon underlies the concept of time. Without the dark-energy-generating space phenomenon, the universe would collapse into a singularity. The P generating vector (time operator: Time/causality/entropy) is perpendicular to all space coordinates for all inertial reference systems and determines the metric expansion of a closed universe. Therefore, we may consider light as the visual representation of the space-time matrix reconfiguration. This concept aims to explain both special and general relativistic physics. The hypothesis introduces a fundamental concept called background tension of the universe ( T ) = H 0 cσ (ms −2 ), where H 0 is the Hubble constant, c is the speed of light, and σ is the tension transfer factor. According to this theory, T determines the value of the gravitational constant ( G ). G is correlated with H 0 according to the formula G = H 0 cσ /4 π. T is remarkably similar to the a 0 constant from MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics) physics, which predicts the rotation of galaxies. Another intriguing aspect of this theory is that it fits well with the universal principle of least action, as long as the “available” space required for any physical phenomenon to manifest in a specific time frame is limited. Dark energy plays a fundamental role in this theory. This approach excludes the dark matter hypothesis and provides theoretical support for observational MOND physics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".