Progesterone and allopregnanolone facilitate excitatory synaptic transmission in the infralimbic cortex via activation of membrane progesterone receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Reproductive hormones may affect cognition by rapidly modulating synaptic responses in the infralimbic cortex. • Stimulation of infralimbic cortex layer I evoked field EPSPs generated by a current sink in layer I. • Both progesterone and allopregnanolone increased EPSP amplitudes in layer I. • The membrane progesterone receptor agonist Org OD 02–0 increased synaptic responses. • Org OD 02–0 also occluded increases in synaptic responses induced by progesterone or allopregnanolone. Estrogens and progesterone can have rapid effects on neuronal function and can modify the use of spatial navigation strategies dependent upon the prefrontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus. Here, we assessed the effects of 17β-estradiol (E2), progesterone, and its metabolite allopregnanolone, on evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the infralimbic region of the female rat prefrontal cortex. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) evoked by stimulation of layer I were first characterized by recording responses at multiple depths between the cortical surface and the underlying white matter. Current source density analysis showed that the short-latency negative component was generated by activation of synaptic currents within layer I, and that putative polysynaptic responses were generated in layers III to V. The amplitude of evoked field EPSPs in layer I was not significantly affected by 20 min application of 17β-estradiol (10 nM), but both 100 nM progesterone and 1 µM allopregnanolone caused lasting increases in field EPSP amplitude. The effects of progesterone were not blocked by the nuclear progesterone receptor antagonist RU486 (1 µM). Both progesterone and allopregnanolone are known to activate membrane progesterone receptors, and we found that the membrane progesterone receptor agonist Org OD 02–0 facilitated EPSPs, and also occluded further increases induced by either progesterone or allopregnanolone. These results provide evidence that both progesterone and allopregnanolone facilitate synaptic responses in layer I of the infralimbic cortex by activating membrane progesterone receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".