MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405762886 · doi:10.21810/sfuer.v16i1.6666

Tutorial Booking and Tracking Application Interactivity

2024· article· en· W4405762886 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tsoghik Grigoryan

Bibliographic record

VenueSFU Educational Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractivityHyperlinkComputer scienceSemioticsMeaning (existential)MultimediaInterface (matter)World Wide WebHuman–computer interactionDomain (mathematical analysis)Web pageLinguisticsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic texts can be highly interactive. Forms of interactivity, such as hyperlinks, shortcuts or tags are not only signs to make meaning on the e-page but also space for actions and changing textual situations. Here, e-page interactivity and textual interaction become two different realms and make a gap between the text analysis and multimodal analysis. This case study aims to analyze the interactivity of the online tutorial booking and tracking application called ‘ ASP tutTrak’ by using a social semiotic multimodal framework for text and image analysis. The application is currently used in the Academic Success Center (ASC) of a tertiary level institution in the United Arab Emirates and was designed by the Information and Communication team of the same institution. The theoretical framework of the study presents multimodal social semiotics analysis of sites, signs and images of the ‘ASP tutTrak’ application through three metafunctions of communication (Halliday, 1978, Kress and Van Leeuwen, 1996, 2006). Since the application under consideration is in the academic domain, this study adapted Chou’s (2003) framework for interaction types for learner-interface and learner-content. Analysis of five sample pages indicate that the interactive meaning potentials of the digital text, interface and content are high and the application is interactive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.444 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSFU Educational ReviewSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207