Development of geomechanical model for determination of elastic modulus and study on law of caving span induced by mechanized longwall mining
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A geomechanical model is developed to determine the elastic modulus, to analyze the rules of rock and surface displacement, and study the caving span caused by mechanized longwall mining.The rules of rock deformation and displacement have been determined, including the stress distribution, the development of the failure zone, the height of the failure zone, the caving span of the longwall, the order of layer arrangement, the displacement deformation vector, the maximum subsidence, and the boundary displacement angle.In this paper, the author uses the Rocdata program to determine the elastic modulus (E), cohesion (C), and internal friction angle () as inputs for the geomechanical model.The software RS2 (Phase 2) from Rocscience Inc. (Canada) is then used to calculate some parameters and displacement quantities.The results showed that the maximum subsidence in the dip direction is = -2.250m and in the strike direction = -0.659m.The boundary displacement angle is 0 = 47.The caving height is H = 10 m.The caving repeats at the span 10th, meaning that the length of the longwall mined in the strike direction reaches 65 m.Afterward, the caving span and the height of the caving zone repeat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it