Distributed Priority-Based Load Shedding over Time-Varying Communication Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the problem of distributed optimal resource allocation on networks with actions defined on discrete spaces, with applications to adaptive under-frequency load-shedding in power systems. In this context, the primary objective is to identify an optimal subset of loads (i.e., resources) in the grid to be shed to maintain system stability whenever there is a sudden imbalance in the generation and loads. The selection of loads to be shed must satisfy demand requirements while also incorporating criticality functions that account for socio-technical factors in the optimization process, enabling the algorithms to differentiate between network nodes with greater socio-technical value and those with less critical loads. Given the discrete nature of the state space in the optimization problem, which precludes the use of standard gradient-based approaches commonly employed in resource allocation problems with continuous action spaces, we propose a novel load-shedding algorithm based on distributed root-finding techniques and the novel concept of cumulative criticality function (CCF). For the proposed approach, convergence conditions via Lyapunov-like techniques are established for a broad class of time-varying communication graphs that interconnect the system's regions. The theoretical results are validated through numerical examples on the Quebec 29-bus system, demonstrating the algorithm's effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".