Celebrity Endorsements Driving Brand Growth and Consumer Behavior Insights: A Case Study of Miu Miu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Researchers have found that celebrity endorsements have a significant impact on brand fandom effects; however, there is still a lack of a unified explanation for the underlying consumer psychology and behavioral issues. With the increasing prevalence of celebrity endorsements, consumer reactions to such marketing strategies have become an important topic in the current research field. Scholars have observed that celebrity endorsements play an important role in enhancing brand fandom effects, yet the psychological motivations and behavioral patterns in this process lack a unified theoretical framework for complete explanation. Therefore, the core of this study is to explore how celebrity endorsements can promote significant progress for brands in the market. The study adopts a process tracing method in case study analysis, focusing on an in-depth exploration from the perspectives of consumer psychology and purchasing behavior. Through this method, the study aims to reveal how celebrity endorsements affect consumer perceptions, attitudes, and ultimate purchasing decisions, and how these factors collectively contribute to the enhancement of brand market performance. By leveraging spokespersons who are highly aligned with the brand image and have a positive image, and through extensive multi-channel dissemination, Miu Miu has successfully sparked heated discussions on social media, and its sales have also achieved significant growth, thus occupying a leading position in the luxury goods market. The brand's strategy focuses on in-depth market insight, flexible communication methods, and continuous strategy optimization, providing valuable references and insights for brands in various industries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".