Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris di Kelas III SDN Kertosari 01 dengan Menggunakan Media Wordwall
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar pada Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas III di SDN Kertosari 01 dengan menggunakan media wordwall. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas, dengan tahapan perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, dan refleksi. Penelitian ini melibatkan 8 siswa dari kelas III SDN Kertosari 01. Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa pada materi I Like Mie Aceh and I Don't Like Coffee di pelajaran Bahasa Inggris menunjukkan peningkatan hasil belajar siswa dengan penggunaan media pembelajaran wordwall. Studi ini dilakukan dalam dua siklus, dengan dua pertemuan setiap siklusnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan media wordwall meningkatkan hasil belajar yaitu yang sebelumnya persentase siswa yang tuntas pada pra siklus hanya sebesar 25%, presentase siswa yang tuntas meningkat menjadi 50% pada siklus I, dan persentase siswa yang tuntas pada siklus II meningkat lagi menjadi 87,50%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".