MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405818230 · doi:10.1142/s0192415x24500861

Efficacy of Oriental Exercises for Non-Motor Symptoms and Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2024· review· en· W4405818230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wanqing Peng, Renhui Zhao, Zhong-qin Huang, Jingpei Zhou, Ziyuan Li, Xinyu Li, Jinyan Yu, Nanbu Wang, Zhenhu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Chinese Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of life (healthcare)MedicinePsychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder without a definitive cure. Oriental exercises (OEs) have emerged as a complementary and alternative therapy for PD, but their efficacy in ameliorating non-motor symptoms (NMS) and quality of life (QOL) remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis actively investigated the efficacy of OEs in addressing NMS and enhancing QOL and sought to offer recommendations for optimal OE regimens for PD patients. By analyzing 30 controlled trials involving 2029 participants, we found that OEs significantly improved cognitive function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and QOL compared to control groups. Specifically, significant improvements were observed in several outcome measures: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) [MD: [Formula: see text]3.67, 95% CI: [Formula: see text]5.72-[Formula: see text]1.63, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], Parkinson's Disease Non-Motor Symptom Questionnaire (NMSQ) [MD: [Formula: see text]2.34, 95% CI: [Formula: see text]4.67-[Formula: see text]0.01, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [MD: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.46-2.03, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) [MD: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49-1.24, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) [MD: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16-1.81, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) [MD: [Formula: see text]4.27, 95% CI: [Formula: see text]6.85-[Formula: see text]1.69, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) [MD: [Formula: see text]0.24, 95% CI: [Formula: see text]0.32-[Formula: see text]0.16, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%], and the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) [MD: [Formula: see text]0.37, 95% CI: [Formula: see text]0.48-[Formula: see text]0.25, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]%]. Our findings provide compelling evidence for the potential benefits of OEs in managing NMS and improving QOL in PD patients. To optimize outcomes, we recommend customizing OE regimens based on individual clinical phenotypes, and to validate these results we emphasize the need for rigorous, large-scale studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.031
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Chinese MedicineSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207