Unveiling smart contract vulnerabilities: Toward profiling smart contract vulnerabilities using enhanced genetic algorithm and generating benchmark dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of blockchain networks, there has been a transition from traditional contracts to Smart Contracts (SCs), which are crucial for maintaining trust within these networks. Previous methods for analyzing SCs vulnerabilities typically suffer from a lack of accuracy and effectiveness. Many of them, such as rule-based methods, machine learning techniques , and neural networks , also struggle to detect complex vulnerabilities due to limited data availability. This study introduces a novel approach to detecting, identifying, and profiling SC vulnerabilities, comprising two key components: an updated analyzer named SCsVulLyzer (V2.0) and an advanced Genetic Algorithm (GA) profiling method. The analyzer extracts 240 features across different categories, while the enhanced GA, explicitly designed for profiling SC vulnerabilities, employs techniques such as penalty fitness function, retention of elites, and adaptive mutation rate to create a detailed profile for each vulnerability. Furthermore, due to the lack of comprehensive validation and evaluation datasets with sufficient samples and diverse vulnerabilities, this work introduces a new dataset named BCCC-SCsVul-2024. This dataset consists of 111,897 Solidity source code samples, ensuring the practical validation of the proposed approach. Additionally, three types of taxonomies are established, covering SC literature review, profiling techniques, and feature extraction. These taxonomies offer a systematic classification and analysis of information, enhancing the efficiency of the proposed profiling technique. Our proposed approach demonstrated superior capabilities with higher precision and accuracy through rigorous testing and experimentation. It not only showed excellent results for evaluation parameters but also proved highly efficient in terms of time and space complexity. Moreover, the concept of the profiling technique makes our model highly transparent and explainable. These promising results highlight the potential of GA-based profiling to improve the detection and identification of SC vulnerabilities, contributing to enhanced security in blockchain networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".