The Role of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase, a Key Regulatory Endocannabinoid Enzyme, in Domain-Specific Cognitive Performance in Psychosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive impairments are particularly disabling for patients with a psychotic disorder and often persist despite optimization of antipsychotic treatment. Thus, motivating an extension of the research focus on the endocannabinoid system. The aim of this study was to evaluate group differences in brain fatty acid amid hydrolase (FAAH), an endocannabinoid enzyme between first-episode psychosis (FEP), individuals with clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis and healthy controls (HCs). Furthermore, to test the hypothesis that FAAH is linked with cognition using positron emission tomography (PET). STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 80 PET scans with the highly selective FAAH radioligand [11C]CURB, including 30 patients with FEP (6 female), 15 CHR (5 female), and 35 HC (19 female). The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and the Berg Card Sorting Test (BCST) were applied to test cognitive performance. STUDY RESULTS: There was no difference in FAAH activity between groups (F2, 75 = 0.75, P = .48; Cohen's f = 0.141; small effect). Overall, there was a difference in the association between groups regarding FAAH activity and the domain visuospatial construction (F2, 72 = 4.67, P = .01; Cohen's f = .36; medium effect). Furthermore, across the sample, lower FAAH activity was associated with a higher percentage of perseverative responses (F1, 66 = 5.06, P = .03; Cohen's f = 0.28, medium effect). CONCLUSIONS: We report evidence for associations between endocannabinoid alterations in FEP and CHR with specific domains of cognition (visuospatial construction and perseverative response), not overall cognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".