MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405850204 · doi:10.2196/66964

Perceptions and Experiences of Developing Prediabetes Awareness and Participating in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Among Hispanic US Adults: Qualitative Study

2024· article· en· W4405850204 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kevin L. Joiner, Mackenzie Adams, Edith Beltrán Minehan, Matthew J. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsPrediabetesPreprintGerontologyPerceptionQualitative researchDiabetes mellitusMedicinePsychologyEnvironmental healthSociologyType 2 diabetesEndocrinologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prediabetes conveys an increased risk for subsequently developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). The National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a widely available intensive behavioral intervention that decreases the risk of developing T2D in adults with prediabetes. Data are needed to inform approaches to increase prediabetes awareness and National DPP participation. Few studies have explored perceptions and experiences of prediabetes diagnosis and National DPP participation, and none have focused on Hispanic adults and participation in the National DPP as implemented by a community-based organization. Objective: This study aims to explore perceptions and experiences of developing prediabetes awareness and participating in the National DPP among Hispanic US adults. Methods: The sample was recruited from participants in the National DPP as implemented in Spanish by a community-based organization in the upper Midwest. Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone in April and May 2021. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Data from the interviews were reviewed, coded, and integrated into themes to reflect the narratives elicited in the interviews. Results: A total of 16 interviews were conducted. The mean age of the participants was 46 (SD 6, range 34-55) years. Most (n=15) identified as female. The majority (n=15) reported having been born in Mexico. More than two-thirds (n=11) had a level of educational attainment of high school completion or less. Nearly half (n=7) reported not having health insurance. Qualitative description resulted in the emergence of four main themes: (1) processing the news of having prediabetes, (2) deciding on treatment for T2D primary prevention, (3) valuing language and cultural congruence in the National DPP, and (4) appreciating action-oriented knowledge gained during National DPP participation. Participants described the emotional impact of becoming aware of having prediabetes. National DPP lifestyle coaches' outreach and recruitment efforts on a local radio program and a Facebook Live (Meta Platforms) broadcast helped raise awareness of prediabetes and influence attitudes toward participation in the National DPP. Values and cultural beliefs appeared to contribute to perceptions and experiences of participating in the National DPP. Participants were inclined to share information about the National DPP with others in their community. Conclusions: This study presents some of the first evidence exploring perceptions and experiences of developing prediabetes awareness and participating in the National DPP among Hispanic US adults. The findings can inform approaches to increase prediabetes awareness and National DPP participation among Hispanic US adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.517
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicDiabetes Management and Education→French-language works237,207→