Self-injury in young bisexual people: a micro-longitudinal investigation (SIBL) of rumination and binegativity on non-suicidal self-injury
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bisexual people have been found to have a higher risk of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) than other sexualities (heterosexual people, gay men). Theories suggest that rumination and discrimination may contribute to the increased risk. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the association state rumination and binegativity have with NSSI urges and behaviour in young bisexual people. The present study was part of a larger research project, the Self-Injury in young Bisexual people: A micro-Longitudinal investigation (SIBL) study. The present study utilised a micro-longitudinal, single group design to assess rumination, binegativity and NSSI every week for a six-week period. Multi-level linear regression was used to examine the association between study variables and NSSI urges and behaviour at the same time point and with the predictors lagged by one week. A total of 207 bisexual young people were recruited to the SIBL research project. Rumination and binegativity were found to be associated with NSSI urges, both concurrently, and prospectively, even when adjusting for other variables. Rumination and binegativity were also associated with NSSI, but only in concurrent analyses. Binegativity did not interact with self-compassion when predicting concurrent NSSI urges or behaviour. Limitations include the reliance on self-selection and self-report data, which may have resulted in biased results and inflated relationships. In addition, the sample were 80% White with 76% of people residing in the UK or U.S.A. Both rumination and binegativity are associated with NSSI risk in young bisexual people. Psychological interventions that target rumination may be beneficial, alongside social interventions to reduce binegativity. Future research should focus on testing a rumination-focused therapy with this population or investigating additional factors with a non-bisexual comparison group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it