Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Consortium RESILIENT Conference on Pediatric Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Survivorship After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part IV. Patient Important Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) occurs in approximately 1 in 5 pediatric allogeneic HCT patients and is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality. Late effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may lead to long-term chronic health conditions and shortened life expectancy. In addition to direct physiologic challenges from cGVHD and other late effects, numerous patient-important outcomes impact the quality of life (QOL) of patients and their families. The Research and Education towards Solutions for Late Effects to Innovate, Excel, and Nurture (RESILIENT) after GVHD Consensus Conference was convened to better understand the overlap of cGVHD and late effects in pediatric HCT survivors. Working Committee IV: Patient Important Outcomes identified 4 key areas for focus: (1) What are the key mental health and QOL concerns of survivors of pediatric cGVHD? (2) What is the impact of cGVHD on cognitive performance and social development? (3) What multilevel social determinants of health impact cGVHD survivors, families, and communities? (4) What is the role of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors on the development of cGVHD and the risk for adverse outcomes related to survivorship? For each focus area, the Working Committee reviewed the current state of the field, developed recommendations for clinical practice, and highlighted areas to prioritize for future research. Eleven recommendations were adapted and approved. Substantial overlap exists between the role of cGVHD and late effects on the QOL and mental health of childhood HCT survivors. Recommendations based on available data and consensus opinion may be helpful to improve outcomes for these patients. However, several gaps remain that need further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".