Impact of Soil Insecticides on Western Corn Rootworm and Maize Yield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Western Corn Rootworm ( Diabrotica virgifera virgifera ) is a major pest in maize production, causing significant economic losses globally. This study investigates the biology and ecology of the Western Corn Rootworm, focusing on its life cycle, feeding behavior, and ecological adaptations, which contribute to its persistence and the development of resistance. A comprehensive analysis of various soil insecticides, including their classification, modes of action, and application methods, was conducted, and their efficacy in controlling Western Corn Rootworm populations was evaluated through field trials and experimental data. This study explores the relationship between Western Corn Rootworm infestation and maize yield loss, highlighting the long-term impact of soil insecticide use on maize productivity. It also addresses the development of resistance in Western Corn Rootworm populations and proposes management strategies to mitigate the development of resistance. Furthermore, this study discusses the impact of soil insecticides on the environment and non-target organisms, with a focus on soil health, microbial communities, and non-target species. The role of soil insecticides within an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) framework is analyzed, emphasizing the importance of combining chemical, biological, and cultural control methods. This study identifies the latest trends in soil insecticide development and application, biotechnological advancements, and research gaps, and provides recommendations for sustainable Western Corn Rootworm management practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".