AZR-MD-001 0.5% selenium sulfide ophthalmic ointment for the treatment of contact lens discomfort: A vehicle-controlled, randomized, clinical trial
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contact lens discomfort (CLD) is a common problem for CL wearers, and patients with CLD often have changes in meibomian gland function and structure. In a Phase 2 trial AZR-MD-001 0.5% (AZR) ophthalmic ointment improved meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in non-lens wearers. The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AZR in participants with CLD and concomitant MGD. METHODS: Adults with CLD (Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 >12, range 0-37) and MGD (Meibomian Gland Secretion Score [MGS] ≤12, range 0-45) were randomized (1:1) to AZR:vehicle applied twice-weekly in a three-month multicenter, prospective, double-masked study. Endpoints included difference in change from baseline (CFB) in the number of Meibomian Glands Yielding Liquid Secretion (MGYLS), MGS, the ability to wear their lenses as long as desired, and safety. RESULTS: At Month 3, AZR (n = 34) significantly increased the MGYLS and MGS versus vehicle (n = 33), with least squares mean difference (LSMD) CFB in MGYLS of 5.0 (SE = 0.47) for AZR and 1.6 (0.45) for vehicle, P < 0.0001; MGS of 13.8 (SE = 0.67) for AZR and 3.8 (SE = 0.68) for vehicle, P < 0.0001. Significantly more participants treated with AZR were able to wear lenses as long as desired (43% vs. 6%, P = 0.0023). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was eye irritation (61.8% AZR; 0% vehicle). All TEAEs related to treatment were mild/moderate, transient, and did not result in discontinuation. CONCLUSION: AZR-MD-001 0.5% significantly improved MGD signs and hours of comfortable CL wear, demonstrating good efficacy, safety, and tolerability in those with CLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it