Peer victimization and non-suicidal self-injury among depressed adolescents: a moderated mediation model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among teenagers with depression is a major and pervasive issue. Previous studies have established peer victimization as a risk factor for non-suicidal self-injury. However, little is known about how it influences teenagers to harm themselves non-suicidally. A total of 740 depressive outpatients aged 12–18 years with non-suicidal self-injury were selected. General demographic information was collected using the self-designed scale, and relevant information was collected using the Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale, and the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children. After controlling for age and sex, it was discovered that depressive symptoms partially mediated the association between peer victimization and non-suicidal self-injury (p < 0.001). The mediating influence of depressive symptoms was modulated by borderline personality features. Half of the mediating effect is the moderating influence (p = 0.002). The moderated mediation model constructed in this study reveals the internal mechanism between adolescent peer victimization and non-suicidal self-injury, which is of great significance for the prevention and intervention of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".