MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405878807 · doi:10.26740/jggp.v22n2.p95-110

TIME-SERIES EXPANSION OF OIL PALM PLANTATION IN PULANG PISAU REGENCY

2024· article· en· W4405878807 on OpenAlexaff
Baskara Suprojo, Muhammad Irfan Affandi

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL GEOGRAFI Geografi dan Pengajarannya · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Palm Production and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalm oilElaeis guineensisPalmAgrarian societyAgricultureLand useAgroforestryBusinessForestryGeographyAgricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primadonna of oil palm is unavoidable as the largest commercially cultivated crop in tropical regions, especially Indonesia. The escalation in oil palm demand aligns with Land Use Land Cover (LULC) conversion and the transformation of global agricultural landscape. Expansion in Kalimantan proves that the oil palm areas increased from 90,300 ha to 3,164,000 ha, with 90% of the converted land being forest areas. Complexity of these issues drives need to conduct research on oil palm plantation expansion in Pulang Pisau Regency. This study presents the manifestation of LULC conversion into oil palm plantations through remote sensing. The results show the expansion of oil palm plantations from 2009-2023, non-compliance with applicable spatial regulations, and changes in the agrarian structure of the surrounding communities. This analysis can serve as a decision-making tool for stakeholders in the oil palm sector that is effective and efficient in terms of cost, time, and effort. Keywords: Spatial Analysis, Oil Palm, Community, Government Regulation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL GEOGRAFI Geografi dan PengajarannyaSame topicOil Palm Production and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207