Ultra‐high temporal resolution <scp>4D</scp> angiography using arterial spin labeling with subspace reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To achieve ultra-high temporal resolution non-contrast 4D angiography with improved spatiotemporal fidelity. METHODS: Continuous data acquisition using 3D golden-angle sampling following an arterial spin labeling preparation allows for flexibly reconstructing 4D dynamic angiograms at arbitrary temporal resolutions. However, k-space data is often temporally "binned" before image reconstruction, negatively affecting spatiotemporal fidelity and limiting temporal resolution. In this work, a subspace was extracted by linearly compressing a dictionary constructed from simulated curves of an angiographic kinetic model. The subspace was used to represent and reconstruct the voxelwise signal timecourse at the same temporal resolution as the data acquisition without temporal binning. Physiological parameters were estimated from the resulting images using a Bayesian fitting approach. A group of eight healthy subjects were scanned and the in vivo results reconstructed by different methods were compared. Because of the difficulty of obtaining ground truth 4D angiograms with ultra-high temporal resolution, the in vivo results were cross-validated with numerical simulations. RESULTS: The proposed method enables 4D time-resolved angiography with much higher temporal resolution (14.7 ms) than previously reported (˜50 ms) while maintaining high spatial resolution (1.1 mm isotropic). Blood flow dynamics were depicted in greater detail, thin vessel visibility was improved, and the estimated physiological parameters also exhibited more realistic spatial patterns with the proposed method. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a subspace compressed kinetic model into the reconstruction of 4D ASL angiograms notably improved the temporal resolution and spatiotemporal fidelity, which was subsequently beneficial for accurate physiological modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".