Assessing feasibility and acceptability of increasing access to sexual and reproductive health and rights through pharmacy outlets and community health volunteers: lessons from pilot study in Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion are major public health problems in Kenya. The World Health Organization recommends the use of medication abortion to stop unwanted pregnancies. However, the extent of provision and uptake of medication abortion through private pharmacies in Kenya is not well known. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of utilizing pharmacy outlets and community health volunteers to increase women's and girls' access to information, medication abortion and other sexual and reproductive health services and rights. METHODS: December 2022, in Homa Bay County. Data collection involved baseline and endline interviews with 10 pharmacy staff (drawn from 9 pharmacy outlets) and 20 community health volunteers while program data was extracted from pharmacy sales records. RESULTS: A total of 527 clients obtained medication abortion drugs from the 9 participating pharmacy outlets between April and December 2022. There was a steady increase in the number of clients served from 15 clients in April 2022 to 112 clients in December 2022. Out of the 527 clients, 523 of them obtained family planning methods. All the pharmacy staff and community health volunteers expressed satisfaction and positive attitude towards the services provided to clients. CONCLUSION: Results of the study show that the provision of medication abortion and other sexual and reproductive health services such as contraceptives to women and girls through private pharmacy outlets was feasible and acceptable. Building the capacity of community health volunteers to create awareness, strengthen referral and follow-up activities increased demand and uptake of sexual and reproductive health services including medication abortion over the project period. Overall, the interventions implemented in a rural county in Western Kenya have potential in addressing the problem of unsafe abortion which is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in Kenya and other developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".