Geology, Petrology and Geochronology of the Late Cretaceous Klaza Epithermal Deposit: A Window into the Petrogenesis of an Emerging Porphyry Belt in the Dawson Range, Yukon, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geologic understanding of the richly mineralized Dawson Range gold belt (DRGB) in the central Yukon, Canada is hindered by: (1) limited outcrop exposure due to thick soil cover; and (2) low resolution age-constraints despite a long history of porphyry Cu–Au–Mo deposit (PCD) exploration. Here, the well-preserved Klaza Au–Ag–Pb–Zn porphyry–epithermal deposit is used as a type-example of Late Cretaceous magmatic–hydrothermal mineralization to address the complex metallogeny of the DRGB. U–Pb zircon dating defines four magmatic pulses of Late Triassic to Late Cretaceous ages with the latter consisting of the Casino (80–72 Ma) and Prospector Mt. (72–65 Ma) suites. The Casino suite has five phases of intermediate-to-felsic calc-alkaline composition, correspond with older (77 Ma) porphyry mineralization, and displays evidence of magma mingling. The intermediate-to-mafic, slightly alkalic Prospector Mt. suite shows evidence of mingling with the youngest Casino suite phases, correlates with younger (71 Ma), intermediate-sulfidation epithermal and porphyry-type mineralization, and shoshonitic basalts of the Carmacks Group. Zircon trace element data suggest a common melt source for these suites; however, the younger suite records features (e.g., high La/Yb) that indicate a higher pressure melt source. The results from this study highlight the Prospector Mt. suite as a historically overlooked causative magma event linked to Au-rich PCDs in the DRGB and extends the temporal window of PCD prospectivity in this area. The transition from mid-Cretaceous Whitehorse suite magmas to Late Cretaceous Casino-Prospector Mt. suite magmas is proposed to reflect a transition from subduction to localized extension, which is becoming more recognized as a common characteristic of productive porphyry belts globally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".