MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405940212 · doi:10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.12.004

Cognitive, Behavioral, and Functional Outcomes of Suspected Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Community-Dwelling Older Persons Without Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia

2024· article· en· W4405940212 on OpenAlex
Dylan X. Guan, Matthew E. Peters, G. Bruce Pike, Clive Ballard, Byron Creese, Anne Corbett, Ellie Pickering, Pamela Roach, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKillam TrustsAlzheimer SocietyHotchkiss Brain Institute
KeywordsDementiaTraumatic brain injuryCognitionMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychologyClinical psychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury is associated with greater risk and earlier onset of dementia. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether later-life changes in subjective cognition and behavior - potential markers of Alzheimer disease - could be observed in cognitively unimpaired older persons with a history of suspected mild traumatic brain injury (smTBI) earlier in life and whether changes in cognition and behavior mediated the link between smTBI and daily function. METHODS: Data for 1392 participants from the Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging were analyzed. A validated self-reported brain injury screening questionnaire was used to determine the history of smTBI. Outcomes were measured using the Everyday Cognition scale (for subjective cognitive decline [SCD]), Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) Checklist, and Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (for function). Inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic and negative binomial regressions were used to model smTBI (exposure) associations with SCD and MBI statuses, and Everyday Cognition-II and MBI Checklist total scores, respectively. Mediation analyses were conducted using bootstrapping. RESULTS: History of smTBI was linked to higher odds of SCD (odds ratio = 1.45, 95% confidence interval: [1.14-1.84]) or MBI (odds ratio = 1.75, 95% confidence interval: [1.54-1.98]), as well as 24% (95% confidence interval: [18%-31%]) higher Everyday Cognition-II and 52% (95% confidence interval: [41%-63%]) higher MBI Checklist total scores. Finally, SCD and MBI mediated approximately 45% and 56%, respectively, of the association between smTBI history and poorer function, as indicated by higher Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities total scores. CONCLUSIONS: smTBI at any point in the life course is linked to poorer cognition and behavior even in community-dwelling older persons without MCI or dementia. Older persons with smTBI may benefit from early dementia risk assessment using tools that measure changes in cognition and behavior. Interventions for declining cognition and behavior may also be beneficial in this population to address functional impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it