MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405943075 · doi:10.1002/smll.202408795

Facile Preparation of Carbon Nanotube‐Based Skin‐Like Pressure Sensors

2024· article· en· W4405943075 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiao Yu, Alex Adronov

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeMaterials scienceNanotechnologyNanotubePressure sensorChemical engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Flexible sensors have garnered significant interest for their potential to monitor human activities and provide valuable feedback for healthcare purposes. Single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) are promising materials for these applications but suffer from issues of poor purity and solubility. Dispersing SWNTs with conjugated polymers (CPs) enhances solution processability, yet the polymer sidechains can insulate the SWNTs, limiting the sensor's operating voltage. This challenge can be addressed by incorporating a self‐immolative linker into the sidechain of a poly(fluorene‐ co ‐phenylene) polymer, facilitating the fast and clean removal of sidechains and enabling the generation of high‐conductivity SWNT materials. In this work, the integration of this advanced material with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to create skin‐like ultra‐wrinkled film surfaces in a simple, cost‐effective, and highly reproducible manner is demonstrated. The sensors exhibit remarkable sensitivity (1,655 kPa⁻¹) across a wide dynamic range (0.003–70.1 kPa, R 2 = 0.9931) when the wrinkle axis is aligned perpendicularly to the interdigitated electrode fingers. The sensor shows an almost instantaneous pressure response and maintains excellent stability. This sensor can monitor various human motions, from low‐intensity activities such as breathing, pulse, and voice vibrations to high‐intensity actions like walking and jumping, highlighting their potential use in wearable human health monitoring systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207