New acquisitions to the personal papers of Ivan Kalynovych as an example of archival fonds collecting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proposed article describes the new acquisitions to the personal papers of the outstanding Ukrainian bibliographer Ivan Tytovych Kalynovych in the Manuscript Department of Vasyl Stefanyk National Scientific Library of Ukraine in Lviv that his family brought from Canada. Among the newly acquired original archival materials there are two diplomatic documents issued by the government of the Western Ukrainian National Republic (ZUNR) for travel abroad (1919), a letter of Mykhailo Hrushevskyi with the terms of publication of the work “Bibliography of Ukrainian sociological and socialist literature for the years 1871–1920” (1921), the Agreement between Osyp Nazaruk on behalf of the ZUNR government and Ivan Kalynovych concerning the publication of the work “Bibliography of Ukrainian Political Literature” (1921). The attempt to investigate some little-known aspects of socio- political and bibliographic activities of Ivan Kalynovych during emigration in Vienna in 1919–1922, in particular, his relationship with Mykhailo Hrushevskyi was made. The article includes the first preliminary Inventory of the bibliographic works by Ivan Kalynovych which were acquired by the Manuscript Department of the Lviv Branch of the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR in 1940, i.e. in the period of formation of the Library’s manuscript collection. The first processing of the bibliographer’s papers brought from Zolochiv was carried out, particularly the card index was organized in April – May, 1941. The article presents photo illustrations of some documents. Keywords: Ivan Kalynovych, Mykhailo Hrushevskyi, Volodymyr Doroshenko, Osyp Nazaruk, archival fonds collecting, bibliographic index; Manuscript Department of the Lviv branch of the Library of Academy of Sciences of Ukrainian SSR; Shevchenko Scientific Society in Lviv; ZUNR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".