Delivery determinants of an <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> type VI secretion system bifunctional peptidoglycan hydrolase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Acinetobacter baumannii is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen and is a common cause of nosocomial infections. The increasing development of antibiotic resistance in this organism is a global health concern. The A. baumannii clinical isolate AB307-0294 produces a type VI secretion system (T6SS) that delivers three antibacterial effector proteins that give this strain a competitive advantage against other bacteria in polymicrobial environments. Each effector, Tse15, Tde16, and Tae17, is delivered via a non-covalent interaction with a specific T6SS VgrG protein (VgrG15, VgrG16, and VgrG17, respectively). Here we define the regions of interaction between Tae17 and its cognate delivery protein VgrG17 and identify that amino acids G1069 and W1075 in VgrG17 are essential for Tae17 delivery via the T6SS, the first time such specific delivery determinants of T6SS cargo effectors have been defined. Furthermore, we determine that the Tae17 effector is a multidomain, bifunctional, peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme that has both amidase activity, which targets the sugar-peptide bonds, and lytic transglycosylase activity, which targets the peptidoglycan sugar backbone. Moreover, we show that the Tae17 transglycosylase activity is more important than amidase activity for the killing of Escherichia coli . This study provides molecular insight into how the T6SS allows A. baumannii strains to gain dominance in polymicrobial communities and thus improve their chances of survival and transmission. IMPORTANCE We have shown that the Acinetobacter baumannii T6SS effector Tae17 is a modular, bifunctional, peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme that has both lytic transglycosylase and amidase activities. Both activities contribute to the ability to degrade peptidoglycan, but the transglycosylase activity was more important for the killing of Escherichia coli . We have defined the specific regions of Tae17 and its cognate delivery protein VgrG17 that are necessary for the non-covalent interactions and, for the first time, identified specific amino acids essential for T6SS cargo effector delivery. This work contributes to our molecular understanding of bacterial competition strategies in polymicrobial environments and may provide a window to design new therapeutic approaches for combating infection by A. baumannii .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".